Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1650

These two are practically equal for gaming.

Verdict

  • Performance index: practically equal (20 vs 20).
  • 1080p high, 23 popular games: about the same on average (est.).
  • 1440p high, 23 popular games: about the same on average (est.).
  • 4K high, 23 popular games: about the same on average (est.).
  • Video memory: Arc A380 has 6 GB vs 4 GB.
  • Power (TDP): Arc A380 75 W, GeForce GTX 1650 75 W.
  • Age: the Arc A380 is 3 years newer (2022 vs 2019).
  • Ray tracing: only the Arc A380 has hardware ray tracing.
  • Upscaling: XeSS (XMX) only on the Arc A380; both run FSR.

FPS figures assume a Ryzen 7 9850X3D, the fastest gaming processor in our catalog, so the graphics card is the limit wherever possible.

Specs

SpecArc A380GeForce GTX 1650
Performance index2020
Brand / seriesIntel Arc ANVIDIA GTX 16
Released20222019
Video memory6 GB4 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus96-bit128-bit
Power (TDP)75 W75 W
Hardware ray tracingYesNo
UpscalingXeSS (XMX), FSRFSR

Ray tracing and upscaling support follow the GPU architecture (series), not per-game support.

Estimated FPS in popular games (high preset)

Estimated FPS from our model (v0), based on the game's published requirements and relative GPU/CPU performance. Not measured. Real results vary with drivers, patches, and scenes. Values above 300 fps show as 300+.

Values above 300 fps are shown as 300+. Hover a value for its range. How we estimate FPS

Related comparisons