GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 6400

These two are practically equal for gaming.

Verdict

  • Performance index: practically equal (20 vs 20).
  • 1080p high, 23 popular games: about the same on average (est.).
  • 1440p high, 23 popular games: about the same on average (est.).
  • 4K high, 23 popular games: about the same on average (est.).
  • Video memory: both have 4 GB.
  • Power (TDP): GeForce GTX 1650 75 W, Radeon RX 6400 53 W; the Radeon RX 6400 delivers 42% more performance per watt.
  • Age: the Radeon RX 6400 is 3 years newer (2022 vs 2019).
  • Ray tracing: only the Radeon RX 6400 has hardware ray tracing.

FPS figures assume a Ryzen 7 9850X3D, the fastest gaming processor in our catalog, so the graphics card is the limit wherever possible.

Specs

SpecGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 6400
Performance index2020
Brand / seriesNVIDIA GTX 16AMD RX 6000
Released20192022
Video memory4 GB4 GB
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus128-bit64-bit
Power (TDP)75 W53 W
Hardware ray tracingNoYes
UpscalingFSRFSR

Ray tracing and upscaling support follow the GPU architecture (series), not per-game support.

Estimated FPS in popular games (high preset)

Estimated FPS from our model (v0), based on the game's published requirements and relative GPU/CPU performance. Not measured. Real results vary with drivers, patches, and scenes. Values above 300 fps show as 300+.

Values above 300 fps are shown as 300+. Hover a value for its range. How we estimate FPS

Related comparisons