GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs Radeon R9 Fury

The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is about 13% faster for gaming.

Verdict

  • Performance index: the GeForce GTX 1660 Super is 13% faster (35 vs 31).
  • 1080p high, 23 popular games: GeForce GTX 1660 Super +12% on average (est.); the processor caps both in 1 of 23 games.
  • 1440p high, 23 popular games: GeForce GTX 1660 Super +13% on average (est.).
  • 4K high, 23 popular games: GeForce GTX 1660 Super +12% on average (est.).
  • Video memory: GeForce GTX 1660 Super has 6 GB vs 4 GB.
  • Power (TDP): GeForce GTX 1660 Super 125 W, Radeon R9 Fury 275 W; the GeForce GTX 1660 Super delivers 148% more performance per watt.
  • Age: the GeForce GTX 1660 Super is 4 years newer (2019 vs 2015).

FPS figures assume a Ryzen 7 9850X3D, the fastest gaming processor in our catalog, so the graphics card is the limit wherever possible.

Specs

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 SuperRadeon R9 Fury
Performance index3531
Brand / seriesNVIDIA GTX 16AMD R9 Fury
Released20192015
Video memory6 GB4 GB
Memory typeGDDR6HBM
Memory bus192-bit4096-bit
Power (TDP)125 W275 W
Hardware ray tracingNoNo
UpscalingFSRFSR

Ray tracing and upscaling support follow the GPU architecture (series), not per-game support.

Estimated FPS in popular games (high preset)

Estimated FPS from our model (v0), based on the game's published requirements and relative GPU/CPU performance. Not measured. Real results vary with drivers, patches, and scenes. Values above 300 fps show as 300+.

Values above 300 fps are shown as 300+. Hover a value for its range. How we estimate FPS

Related comparisons